Frontiers of Finance https://ojs.as-pub.com/index.php/FF <p><strong>ISSN: 3029-1666(Online)</strong></p> <p>Frontiers of Finance (FF) is an international open-access academic journal dedicated to publishing highly professional research in all fields related to finance. All manuscripts are subjected to a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and originality. We are interested in original research discoveries. This journal also features a wide range of research in ancillary areas relevant to financial markets and investment strategies.</p> <p>The journal publishes various article types, including original research articles, review articles, editorials, and commentaries. The research topics of FF&nbsp;include but are not limited to:</p> <ol> <li class="show">Asset Pricing</li> <li class="show">Financial markets and institutions,</li> <li class="show">Investment and asset management,</li> <li class="show">Corporate finance,</li> <li class="show">Behavioral finance,</li> <li class="show">Financial technology</li> <li class="show">Cryptocurrency and Blockchain</li> <li class="show">Digital Banking</li> <li class="show">Risk Management</li> <li class="show">ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) Investing</li> </ol> <p><strong>The article processing charges is $800 per article.</strong></p> Arts and Science Press en-US Frontiers of Finance 3029-1666 Navigating Complexities in Sino-US trade relations: An in-depth analysis of RCA, TCI, and ESI in SITC commodities https://ojs.as-pub.com/index.php/FF/article/view/9167 <p>This paper presents a thorough examination of Sino–U.S. trade dynamics from 2008 to 2022, utilizing the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) for commodity categorization. It employs essential trade indices, including the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), the Trade Complementarity Index (TCI), and the Export Similarity Index (ESI), to assess trade competitiveness and complementarity. The RCA findings reveal China's persistent comparative advantage in sectors such as machinery and transport equipment (C7), with values predominantly exceeding 1. At the same time, the United States demonstrates significant advantages in chemicals (C5) and crude materials (C2), also with RCA values above 1. TCI analysis shows China's stability in C0 but declining complementarity in C2, whereas the US demonstrates increasing complementarity in C2, C5, C7, and C8. ESI results reveal high structural similarity in C7 and partial alignment in C8, suggesting potential for bilateral cooperation. The study recommends that both countries strategically leverage their respective strengths and pursue collaboration in areas with high complementarity to optimize trade outcomes in a shifting global economic landscape.</p> Zeeshan Iqbal Shahzad Ahmad Imad Ahmad ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2025-04-14 2025-04-14 3 1 10.59429/ff.v3i1.9167 Adoption of Neo-Banks: A Behavioural Reasoning Theory (BRT) Approach https://ojs.as-pub.com/index.php/FF/article/view/9049 <p>Changes in preferences of consumers and advancement in technology the banking industry has gone through a change and has resulted to newer forms of banks providing services. One such form is Neo Bank. High demand for Neobanks is caused by wide availability of cell phones and Internet. At the same time, there exist a big problem with the successful persuasion of clients to switch from traditional banking to mobile banking. This is because a great number of customers does not find mobile banking solutions acceptable rather they desire to communicate with banks through face to face contacts or telephonic conversations. In this context, we use Behavioural Reasoning Theory (BRT) an established IS research paradigm to explore the reasons for and against adoption of Neobanks. The data was gathered using netnography method and we have used Structure Topic Modelling (STM) to analyze the data. We extracted insights from the textual data, and performed sentiment analysis to determine how people felt about Neo Banks. According to the findings of our research, the reasons for adopting Neobanks are: Convenience and Digital Accessibility, Cost Savings, Personalisation together with Technological Integration, and Support for Small Businesses. The reasons given against Neobanks are: Security Concerns, Uncertainty in Regulations and Compliance, Problems in the Interface and Financial Literacy Issues, and Consumer Preferences for Traditional Banking. Testing and exploration prior to full adoption and, risk evaluation and value assessment are the variables that are associated with the Behavioural Intention, which is an individual’s conscious decision of performing or not performing a behavior and it is determined by reasons, beliefs and attitude behind it. This research has significant repercussions for managerial decisions and policymaking. To effectively implement strategies that enhance adoption, confidence, and accessibility while also fix unpredictability about legal and security issues, it is crucial for senior leaders of Neobanks, fintech businesses, regulatory bodies, and legislators to have a comprehensive understanding of such factors.</p> Sohom Banerjee Sanchita Chatterjee Ayan Bhattacharjee ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2025-05-16 2025-05-16 3 1 9049 10.59429/ff.v3i1.9049