Earthquake

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
Register Login

Editors-in-Chief

Dr. Xu Chong

National Institute of Natural Hazards, China

ISSN

3029-1550(Online)

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$800

Publication Frequency

Semiyearly

Download Full Text PDF

Published

2025-11-21

Issue

Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Publishing

Section

Articles

Evaluation of Parameters Affecting the Inelastic Acceleration Ratio

Emad Ali Elhout

Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Damanhour University, Egypt


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ear.v3i2.8454


Keywords: The Inelastic Acceleration Ratio, damping ratio, the post-yield stiffness ratio the vibration period, ductility ratio.


Abstract

The Inelastic Acceleration Ratio (IAR) is a helpful instrument for determining the maximum inelastic acceleration from the related elastic acceleration that seems to have been little examined in past research. The IARs using single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems with various structural factors under thirty pairs of ground motion earthquakes recorded are investigated in this paper. The linear elastic-perfect plastic model is used to model SDOF systems. The factors to consider include elastic vibration period (T), displacement ductility ratios (μ, 2-8), the post-yield stiffness ratio (α, 0-15%), and the damping ratio (x, 3-20%). The results showed that the IAR values are decreased with an increase in the ductility ratios (μ) while the IAR values are increased with an increase in the damping ratios (x). While the post-yield stiffness ratio (α) has little effect on the IAR. Also, Analytical formulae are used to estimate IAR based on the T, μ, α, and x.


References

1.BÖREKÇİ M, AYDOĞAN B (2024) Prediction of inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of degrading SDOF systems: A comparison of the scaled conjugate gradient and Bayesian regularized artificial neural network modeling. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 42(1): 211-224. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2024.00018

2.COSMOS (2017) The Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems. http:// www.cosmos-eq.org/

3.Chikh B, Ahmed M, Nacer L, Moussa L, Youcef M, Mohamed H, Abderrahmane K, Djilali B (2017) Seismic structural demands and inelastic deformation ratios: a theoretical approach. Earthquakes and Structures 12 (4): 397-407. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.4.397

4.De Francesco G (2019) Constant-ductility inelastic displacement ratios for displacement-based seismic design of self-centering structures. Earthquake Engineering Structure Dynamic 48:188–209.

5.Dong H, Han Q, Du X, Liu J (2020) Constant ductility inelastic displacement ratios for the design of self-centering structures with flag-shaped models subjected to pulse-type ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 133: 106143.

6.Federal Emergency Management Agency- FEMA450 (2003) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1: Provisions and Part 2: Commentary, Washington D.C.

7.Garakaninezhad A, Amiri S (2022) Inelastic acceleration ratio of structures under pulse-like earthquake ground motions. In Structures 44: 1799-1810.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.102

8.Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2009) Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Engineering Structures 31(11):2744–55.

9.Hatzigeorgiou GD, Papagiannopoulos GA. Inelastic velocity ratio. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2012; 41:2025–41.

10.Hatzigeorgiou GD, Pnevmatikos NG (2014) Maximum damping forces for structures with viscous dampers under near-source earthquakes. Eng Struct 68:1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.036

11.Kam WY, Pampanin S, Palermo A, Carr AJ (2010) Self-centering structural systems with combination of hysteretic and viscous energy dissipations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 39(10):1083–1108.

12.Konstandakopoulou F, Hatzigeorgiou G (2020) Constant-ductility inelastic displacement, velocity and acceleration ratios for systems subjected to simple pulses. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 131:106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106027

13.Obando JC, Lopez-Garcia D (2016) Inelastic displacement ratios for nonstructural components subjected to floor accelerations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1244131

14.Pardalopoulos SI, Pantazopoulou SJ (2015) Seismic response of nonstructural components attached on multistorey buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(1): 139–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2466

15.Ruiz-García J (2011) Inelastic displacement ratios for seismic assessment of structures subjected to forward-directivity near-fault ground motions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 5: 449–68.

16.SeismoSignal, version 4.3.0, Pavia, Italy: Seismosoft Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com/en/HomePage.aspx

17.Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Daneshgari S, Neekmanesh S (2020) Inelastic displacement ratio for high damping SDOF systems built on soft soil sites. Soil Dynamics, and Earthquake Engineering 135: 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106203



ISSN: 3029-1550
21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com