Geomagnetic anomalies observed during earthquakes: A review of Scopus database papers published in English between 1975 and 2024.
Valijon Yusupov
Head of the Laboratory of the Institute of Seismology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Associate Professor at the Tashkent Technical University
Elbek Khakimov
Engineer at the Institute of Seismology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ear.v3i2.9284
Keywords: geomagnetic field; variations; earthquakes; anomalies
Abstract
This bibliometric analysis aims to examine published articles on anomalies observed in the magnetic field due to earthquakes in fourteen seismically active countries between 1975 and 2024. The data used in this analysis are obtained from the online version of the Scopus database and correspond to 290 publications according to the selection criteria. The bibliometric analysis showed that most of the articles were published in English, with the largest number of publications coming from Japan, China, Türkiye, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, Italy, the Russian Federation, and Chile. Out of the 290 articles reviewed, 28 earthquakes showed changes in 6 parameters. The anomaly of the BH component of the magnetic field accounted for 28% of the total. The change in BZ is 20%, D 18%, ∆F 18%, BX 14%, BY 2%.
References
1.Rokityansky, I.I., Babak, V.I., Tereshyn, A.V. and Hayakawa, M. (2019) Variations of Geomagnetic Re-sponse Functions before the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 8, 70-84. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2019.82005
2.Huang, Y.; Zhu, P.; Li, S. Feasibility Study on Earthquake Prediction Based on Impending Geomagnetic Anomalies. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010263
3.O. Özcan, S. Sağır, R.Atıcı. The relationship between TEC and Earth’s magnetic field during quiet and disturbed days over Istanbul, Türkiye, Advances in Space Research 65 (2020) 2167–2171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.035
4.Teti Zubaidah, Bulkis Kanata, Cipta Ramadhani, Budi Irmawati, Comprehensive Geomagnetic Signal Processings for Sucessful Earthquake Prediction, DOI: 10.1109/QiR.2013.6632567
5.A. Kotsarenko, V. Yutsis, V. Grimalsky, S. Koshevaya and Yu. Kotsarenko, Geomagnetic anomalies in the area of Popocatepetl volcano, Mexico, Geofísica internacional(2019) 58-2: 101-111
6.Borys Ladanivskyy a, Jacques Zlotnicki b, Paolo Reniva c, Paul Alanis c, Electromagnetic signals on active volcanoes: Analysis of electrical resistivity and transfer functions at Taal volcano (Philippines) related to the 2010 seismovolcanic crisis, Journal of Applied Geophysics Volume 156, September 2018, Pages 67-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.01.033
7.Tozzi, R., De Michelis, P., Coco, I., & Giannattasio, F. (2019). A preliminary risk assessment of geomagnetically induced currents over the Italian territory.Space Weather, 17, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002065
8.В. В. Адушкин1, М. Ю. Кузьмичева, А. А. Спивак, Возмущение геомагнитного поля при землетрясениях, Доклады российской академии наук. Науки о земле, 2022, том 506, № 2, с. 252–258, DOI: 10.31857/S2686739722700025
9.Enrique G. Cordaro, Patricio Venegas, David Laroze, Latitudinal variation rate of geomagnetic cutoff rigidity in the active Chilean convergent margin, Ann. Geophys., 36, 275–285, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-275-2018
10.Дж. К. Карапетян , Э. Г. Геодакян , член-корреспондент НАН РА С. М. Оганесян, С. Р. Шахпаронян , Р. К. Карапетян: Аномалия геомагнитного поля, предшествующая возникновению землетрясений на территории Республики Армения и сопредельных районов, DOI: 10.54503/0321-1339-2022.122.4-287
11.Collado‐Villaverde, A., Muñoz, P., & Cid, C. (2024). A framework for evaluating geomagnetic indices forecasting models. Space Weather, 22, e2024SW003868. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003868
12.Mathew J. Owens · Luke A. Barnard · Raimund Muscheler · Konstantin Herbst · Mike Lockwood · Ilya Usoskin · Eleanna Asvestari : A Geomagnetic Estimate of Heliospheric Modulation Potential Over the Last 175 Years, A version of this preprint was published at Solar Physics on June 1st, 2024. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02316-9.
13.Ouyang, X.-Y.; Wang, Y.-F.; Zhang, X.-M.; Wang, Y.-L.; Wu, Y.-Y.: A New Analysis Method for Magnetic Disturbances Possibly Related to Earthquakes Observed by Satellites. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs14112709
14.Tozzi, R., De Michelis, P., Coco, I., & Giannattasio, F. (2019): A preliminary risk assessment of geomagnetically induced currents over the Italian territory. Space Weather, 17, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002065
15.Hongyan Chen 1 , Rui Wang 1, Miao Miao 1 , Xiaocan Liu 2, Yonghui Ma 3 , Katsumi Hattori 4,5 and Peng Han 1: A Statistical Study of the Correlation between Geomagnetic Storms and M ≥ 7.0 Global Earthquakes during 1957–2020, Entropy 2020, 22, 1270; doi:10.3390/e22111270
16.Klausner, V., O. Mendes, M. O. Domingues, A. R. R. Papa, R. H. Tyler, P. Frick, and E. A. Kherani (2014), Advantage of wavelet technique to highlight the observed geomagnetic perturbations linked to the Chilean tsunami (2010), J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 119, 3077–3093; https://doi:10.1002/2013JA019398.
17.Rikitake, T. (1976) Geomagnetic and Geoelectric Effects in Earthquake Prediction. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam.
18.Mogi, K. (1985) Geoelectricity and Geomagnetism in Earthquake Prediction. Aca-demic Press, Tokyo.
19.Parrot, M. and Johnston M. (1989) Seismo-Electromagnetic Effects. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 57, 8.
20.Park, S.K., Johnston, M.J.S., Madden, T.R., Morgan, F.D. and Morrison, H.F. (1993) Electromagnetic Precursors to Earthquake in the ULF Band: A Review of Observa-tions and Mechanism. Review of Geophysics, 31, 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG00820
21.Merzer, M. and Klemperer, S.L. (1997) Modeling Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Precursors to the Loma Prieta Earthquake with a Precursory Increase in Fault-Zone Conductivity. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 150, 217-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050074
22.Sarlis, N. and Varotsos, P. (2002) Magnetic Field near the Outcrop of An Almost Horizontal Conductive Sheet. Journal of Geodynamics, 33, 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00008-X.
23.Han, P., Hattori, K., Huang, Q., Hirano, T., Ishiguro, Y., Yoshino, C. and Febriani, F. (2011) Evaluation of ULF Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with the 2000 Izu Island Earthquake Swarm by Wavelet Transform Analysis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11, 965-970. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-965-2011
24.Hattori, K., Han, P., Yoshino, C., Febriani, F., Yamaguchi, H. and Chen, C.H. (2012) Investigation of ULF Seismo-Magnetic Phenomena in Kanto, Japan during 2000-2010: Case Studies and Statistical Studies. Surveys in Geophysics, 34, 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9215-x
25.Hayakawa, M., Kawate, R., Molchanov, O.A. and Yumoto, K. (1996) Results of Ul-tra-Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Measurements during the Guam Earthquake of 8 August 1993. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL02863
26.Hattori, K. (2004) ULF Geomagnetic Changes Associated with Large Earthquakes. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 15, 329-360. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2004.15.3.329(EP)
27.Li, J., Li, Q., Yang, D., Wang, X., Hong, D. and He, K. (2011) Principal Component Analysis of Geomagnetic Data for the Panzhihua Earthquake (Ms6.1) in August 2008. Data Science Journal, 10, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.IAGA-20
28.Li, Q., Yang, X. and Cai, S. (2015) Case Study of Applying Polarization Method to Geomagnetic Array Data. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 10,412-417.
29.Uyeda, S., Hayakawa, M., Nagao, T., Molchanov, O., Hattori, K., Orihara, Y., Go-toh, K., Akinaga, Y. and Tanaka, H. (2002) Electric and Magnetic Phenomena Ob-served before the Volcano-seismic Activity in 2000 in the Izu Island Region, Japan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 7352-7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072208499
30.Serita, A., Hattori, K,, Yoshino, C., Hayakawa, M. and Isezaji, N. (2005) Principal Component Analysis and Singular Spectrum Analysis of ULF Geomagnetic Data Associated with Earthquakes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5,685-689. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-685-2005
31.Li, Q., Zhu, P., Mamatemin, A. and Xu, X. (2011) Detection of ULF Electromagnetic Emission as a Precursors to Two Earthquakes in China. Earthquake Science, 24, 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-011-0822-2
32.Gotoh, K., Hayakawa, M. and Smirnova, N. (2003) Fractal Analysis of the ULF Geomagnetic Data Obtained at Izu Peninsula, Japan in Relation to Nearby Earth-quake Swarm of June-August 2000. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 3,229-236. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-229-2003
33.Telesca, L., Lapenna, V., Macchiato, M. and Hattori, K. (2008) Investigating Non-Uniform Scaling Behavior in Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) Earthquake-Related Geomagnetic Signal. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 268, 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.033
34.Ding, J.H., Lu, Z.Y. and Huang, X.X. (1994) Seismo-Electromagnetism. Seismologi-cal Press, Beijing.
35.Ding, J.H., Yu, S.R. and Wang, Y.L. (2008) Geomagnetic Low-Point Displacement Phenomena and Strong Earthquake Prediction Research. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 23, 1011-1017.
36.Yuan, G.P., Zhang, X.M., Wu, Y.Y. and Zhao, X.D. (2015) Minimum Point Shift of the Geomagnetic Vertical Component in Diurnal Variation and the Inter-nal-External Equivalent Current System Sq before the 2008 Wenchuan Ms8.0 Earthquake. Earthquake, 35, 102-112.
37.Feng, Z.S., Mei, W.P. and Zhang, X.X. (2004) Preliminary Study on the Characteris-tics of Long and Medium Term Variation for the Amplitude Ratio of Geomagnetic Humorous Wave before Moderate-Strong Earthquakes. Northwestern Seismologi-cal Journal, 26, 50-55.
38.Feng, Z.S., Ju, H.H., Li, H.Y., Zhang, X.X., Yang, C.J. and Li, J.Z. (2009) Further Study on Characteristics of Long-Term and Medium Term Variation of Geomag-netic Harmonic Wave Amplitude Ratios before Moderate or Strong Earthquakes.South China Journal of Seismology, 29, 17-23.
39.Feng, Z.S., Li, H.Y., Zhang, X.X., Mei, W.P. and Ye, B.W. (2013) The Relationship between Strong Earthquake and Geomagnetic Harmonic Wave Amplitude Ratio. South China Journal of Seismology, 33, 9-15.
40.Jiang, Y.L., Yuan, G.P., Li, H.Y., Tang, Y.M. and Zhao, W.H. (2016) The Prelimi-nary Analysis on the Characteristics of Geomagnetic Harmonic Wave Amplitude Ratios before the Gaoyou-Baoying Ms 4.9 Earthquake. Earthquake Research in Chi-na, 32, 143-150.
41.Li, Q., Yuan, Y.R., Yang, X., Cai, S.P. and Sun, W.H. (2016) Variation of the Geo-magnetic Harmonic Wave Amplitude Ratio before the Ms5.5 Eryuan Earthquake in 2013. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38, 122-129.
42.Dai, Y., Gao, L.X. and Zhang, L.F. (2016) Study on the Amplitude Ratio Geomag-netic Harmonic Wave in Gansu-Qinghai Region. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 38, 12-25.
43.Ni, X.Y. and Chen, Y. (2016) The Relationship between Strong Earthquakes in Tai-wan and Geomagnetic Harmonic Wave Amplitude Ratio Anomaly in Fujian. South China Journal of Seismology, 36, 56-60.