Collective Ecological Protection: A Systems-Level Theory of Microbial Community Stability
Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca
Department of Geology and Geophysics/LAGEMAR – Marine Geology Laboratory, Institute of Geosciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Avenida Litorânea s/n, 24210-340 Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Christine Gaylarde
Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, 770 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ersr.v4i1.15090
Keywords: microbial ecology; community stability; collective ecological protection; protective architecture; microbial interactions; ecological networks; ecological risk; ecological security
Abstract
Microbial communities persist under recurrent abiotic and biotic disturbance, yet the organizational basis of this persistence remains incompletely explained. Existing frameworks describe resistance, resilience, functional redundancy, social evolution, and ecological networks, but do not explicitly define how demonstrated protective effects are distributed among community members or whether this distribution predicts stability beyond diversity, composition, and functional potential. Here, we propose the Collective Ecological Protection Theory (CEPT), a systems-level framework in which stability is influenced by a protective architecture: the directed, weighted, disturbance- and response-specific network through which the activity of a provider increases the persistence or functional performance of a recipient relative to a matched counterfactual. CEPT separates protective mechanisms from their organization and identifies six candidate descriptors: protective coverage, protective redundancy, mechanistic complementarity, spatial reach, modularity, and dependency concentration. Protection is context dependent and may be weakened by spatial separation, correlated failure, costly cooperation, exploitation, or dependence on a small number of providers. We derive four discriminating predictions based on matched-community rewiring, targeted provider loss, independent protection, and architectural reconstruction during recovery. CEPT receives support to the extent that independently measured protective architecture improves causal or out-of-sample prediction of a specified stability response beyond established compositional, functional, and environmental factors. It therefore offers a testable organizational explanation for how distinct protective processes combine to influence microbial resistance, persistence, recovery, and maintenance of function. By identifying distributed protection and single points of failure, CEPT may also provide a mechanistic basis for assessing ecological vulnerability and risk in disturbed microbial systems.
References
1.Allesina S, Tang S (2012) Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature 483:205–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10832
2.Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11512–11519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801925105
3.Angulo MT, Moog CH, Liu YY (2019) A theoretical framework for controlling complex microbial communities. Nat Commun 10:1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08890-y
4.Banerjee S, Schlaeppi K, van der Heijden MGA (2018) Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1
5.Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidze Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire F, Quiroz CL, Saccone P, Schiffers K, Seifan M, Touzard B, Michalet R (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01295.x
6.Calfee BC, Glasgo LD, Zinser ER (2022) Prochlorococcus exudate stimulates heterotrophic bacterial competition with rival phytoplankton for available nitrogen. mBio 13:e02571-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02571-21
7.Canarini A, Schmidt H, Fuchslueger L, Martin V, Herbold CW, Zezula D, Gündler P, Hasibeder R, Jecmenica M, Bahn M, Richter A (2021) Ecological memory of recurrent drought modifies soil processes via changes in soil microbial community. Nat Commun 12:5308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25675-4
8.Carr A, Diener C, Baliga NS, Gibbons SM (2019). Use and abuse of correlation analyses in microbial ecology. The ISME Journal 13:2647–2655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0459-z
9.Chen S, Chen B, Fath BD (2013) Ecological risk assessment on the system scale: A review of state-of-the-art models and future perspectives. Ecol Model 250:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.10.015
10.Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR (2015) The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science 350:663–666. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2602
11.de Vos MGJ, Zagorski M, McNally A, Bollenbach T (2017) Interaction networks, ecological stability, and collective antibiotic tolerance in polymicrobial infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:10666–10671. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713372114
12.Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2
13.Faust K, Raes J (2012) Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:538–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2832
14.Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S (2016) Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
15.Fujita H, Ushio M, Suzuki K, Abe MS, Yamamichi M, Okazaki Y, Canarini A, Hayashi I, Fukushima K, Fukuda S, Kiers ET, Toju H (2023) Facilitative interaction networks in experimental microbial community dynamics. Front Microbiol 14:1153952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1153952
16.Fukami T (2015). Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160340
17.Gao C, Xu L, Montoya L, Madera M, Hollingsworth J, Chen L, Purdom E, Singan V, Vogel J, Hutmacher RB, Dahlberg JA, Coleman-Derr D, Lemaux PG, Taylor JW (2022) Co-occurrence networks reveal more complexity than community composition in resistance and resilience of microbial communities. Nat Commun 13:3867. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31343-y
18.Goldford JE, Lu N, Bajić D, Estrela S, Tikhonov M, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, Segrè D, Mehta P, Sanchez A (2018). Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science 361:469–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1168
19.Granato ET, Smith WPJ, Foster KR (2023) Collective protection against the type VI secretion system in bacteria. ISME J 17:1052–1062. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01401-4
20.Grilli J, Barabás G, Michalska-Smith MJ, Allesina S (2017) Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature 548:210–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23273
21.Grimm V, Wissel C (1997) Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia 109:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050090
22.Hernandez DJ, David AS, Menges ES, Searcy CA, Afkhami ME (2021) Environmental stress destabilizes microbial networks. ISME J 15:1722–1734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00882-x
23.Ives AR, Carpenter SR (2007) Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133258
24.Jiang Y, Wu R, Zhang W, Xin F, Jiang M (2023) Construction of stable microbial consortia for effective biochemical synthesis. Trends Biotechnol 41:1430–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.05.008
25.Kajihara KT, Hynson NA (2024) Networks as tools for defining emergent properties of microbiomes and their stability. Microbiome 12:184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01868-z
26.Kelsic ED, Zhao J, Vetsigian K, Kishony R (2015) Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities. Nature 521:516–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14485
27.Lee KWK, Periasamy S, Mukherjee M, Xie C, Kjelleberg S, Rice SA (2014) Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm. ISME J 8:894–907. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.194
28.Levine JM, Bascompte J, Adler PB, Allesina S (2017) Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22898
29.Loreau M (2010) From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
30.Loreau M, de Mazancourt C (2013). Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms. Ecology Letters 16(Suppl. 1):106–115. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12073
31.Louca S, Parfrey LW, Doebeli M (2016) Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science 353:1272–1277. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4507
32.Louca S, Polz MF, Mazel F, Albright MBN, Huber JA, O'Connor MI, Ackermann M, Hahn AS, Srivastava DS, Crowe SA, Doebeli M, Parfrey LW (2018) Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems. Nat Ecol Evol 2:936–943. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0519-1
33.Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Valladares F, Lortie CJ (2009) Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol 97:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01476.x
34.Mehlferber EC, Arnault G, Joshi B, Partida-Martinez LP, Patras KA, Simonin M, Koskella B (2024) A cross-systems primer for synthetic microbial communities. Nat Microbiol 9:2765–2773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-024-01827-2
35.Morris JJ, Johnson ZI, Szul MJ, Keller M, Zinser ER (2011) Dependence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus on hydrogen peroxide scavenging microbes for growth at the ocean’s surface. PLoS ONE 6:e16805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016805
36.Nadell CD, Drescher K, Foster KR (2016) Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:589–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.84
37.Oprei A, Schreckinger J, Kholiavko T, Frossard A, Mutz M, Risse-Buhl U (2023) Long-term functional recovery and associated microbial community structure after sediment drying and bedform migration. Front Ecol Evol 11:1112519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1112519
38.Pande S, Kost C (2017) Bacterial unculturability and the formation of intercellular metabolic networks. Trends Microbiol 25:349–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.02.015
39.Philippot L, Griffiths BS, Langenheder S (2021) Microbial community resilience across ecosystems and multiple disturbances. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 85:e00026-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00026-20
40.Piccardi P, Vessman B, Mitri S (2019) Toxicity drives facilitation between 4 bacterial species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:15979–15984. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906172116
41.Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London
42.Power ME, Tilman D, Estes JA, Menge BA, Bond WJ, Mills LS, Daily G, Castilla JC, Lubchenco J, Paine RT (1996) Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience 46:609–620. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312990
43.Renes SE, Sjöstedt J, Fetzer I, Langenheder S (2020) Disturbance history can increase functional stability in the face of both repeated disturbances of the same type and novel disturbances. Sci Rep 10:11333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68104-0
44.Sanchez A (2019). Defining higher-order interactions in synthetic ecology: lessons from physics and quantitative genetics. Cell Systems 9:519–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2019.11.009
45.Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, Bajić D, Osborne ML, Poyatos JF, Sanchez A (2019). High-order interactions distort the functional landscape of microbial consortia. PLOS Biology 17:e3000550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000550
46.Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, Bürgmann H, Huber DH, Langenheder S, Lennon JT, Martiny JBH, Matulich KL, Schmidt TM, Handelsman J (2012) Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol 3:417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00417
47.Spragge F, Bakkeren E, Jahn MT, Araujo EBN, Pearson CF, Wang X, Pankhurst L, Cunrath O, Foster KR (2023) Microbiome diversity protects against pathogens by nutrient blocking. Science 382:eadj3502. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj3502
48.Stouffer DB, Bascompte J (2011) Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3648–3652. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014353108
49.van Elsas JD, Chiurazzi M, Mallon CA, Elhottová D, Krištůfek V, Salles JF (2012) Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109326109
50.Weiss S, Van Treuren W, Lozupone C, Faust K, Friedman J, Deng Y, Xia LC, Xu ZZ, Ursell L, Alm EJ, Birmingham A, Cram JA, Fuhrman JA, Raes J, Sun F, Zhou J, Knight R (2016). Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. The ISME Journal 10:1669–1681. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.235
51.West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A (2007) Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J Evol Biol 20:415–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x
52.Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1463–1468. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463
53.Zachar I, Boza G (2022) The evolution of microbial facilitation: sociogenesis, symbiogenesis, and transition in individuality. Front Ecol Evol 10:798045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.798045