Reilly’s gravity law adapted to finance
Guillermo Peña
Department of Economic Analysis and IEDIS, Universidad de Zaragoza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ff.v2i1.6291
Keywords: pure interest; financial services; asset pricing; gravity models; cash flows
Abstract
The present paper proposes new indicators that explain the pricing of the unitary pure interest rates and interests by adapting previous Reilly’s Law (RL) models of urban economics and regional economics and Financial Gravity (FG) models for financial services. A panel dataset of 114 countries for 1967-2021 is handled, applying the OLS methodology. The results show the higher explanatory power of the adaptation of the FG models rather than the proposed adaptation of the RL ones.
Purpose: This paper tries to adapt previous Gravity Equations from Urban Economics to Finance and empirically checks whether they behave better than the recently found Financial Gravity (FG) models. For that, new indicators are provided jointly with their adaptations to Ordinary Least Square (OLS) methods. Additionally, an economic perspective of the bid-asks of financial products is provided.
Design/methodology/approach: OLS methods are used to check the desirability and accuracy of the new indicators. A panel dataset of 114 countries for 1967-2021 is handled, applying the OLS methodology.
Findings: The most adequate are the FG models after the empirical check, providing the desirable properties of those models. The results show the higher explanatory power of the adaptation of the FG models rather than the proposed adaptation of the RL ones.
Originality: This is the first paper, to the author’s knowledge, on providing an adaptation of Reilly’s Law from urban economics models to finance, also providing empirical evidence after adapting these models to linear expressions for applying OLS methods. We also provide evidence on the statistical equality between the unitary pure interest of loan and deposit interests, confirming the good properties of the FG models.
References
1. Ismail, N. W. (2021). Digital trade facilitation and bilateral trade in selected Asian countries. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(2), 257-271.2. López-Laborda, J., & Peña, G. (2018). A new method for applying VAT to financial services. National Tax Journal, 71(1), 155-182.
3. Peña, G. (2021). The key role of quoted spreads in financial services and transactions. Economics and Business Letters, 10(3), 208-216.
4. Reilly W J, (1931). The Law of Retail Gravitation (Pilsbury, New York), republished in 1953.
5. Poddar, S., & English, M. (1997). Taxation of financial services under a value-added tax: Applying the cash-flow approach. National Tax Journal, 50(1), 89-111.
6. Contreras, C., & Contreras, M. (2015). El impuesto sobre transacciones financieras como impuesto Pigouviano: introducción a una controversia. Análisis Financiero, 127, 01-33.
7. Contreras, C., and Contreras, M. (2018). “El impuesto sobre transacciones financieras: ¿debe establecerse?”, Editorial Académica Española.
8. Peña, G. (2019). Efficient treatment of banking services under VAT. Economics and Business Letters, 8(2), 115-121.
9. Capoani, L. (2023). Review of the gravity model: origins and critical analysis of its theoretical development. SN Business & Economics, 3(5), 95.
10. Capoani, L. (2021). Review of the gravity model: a physical approach to social sciences. Available at SSRN 3845593.
11. Guha, B., Alif-Al-Maruf, M., Das, A., & Sarker, D. (2023). Assessing the internal out-migration on basis of influence area: a case study of Kurigram, Rangpur and Gaibandha districts, Bangladesh. GeoJournal, 88(5), 5511-5536.
12. Zakharchenko, V. I., & Oneshko, S. V. (2022). Information and Analytical Support Consumption Forecasting of Results for Organizational and Technological Systems Modernization. Economics: Time Realities, (4).
13. Biswas, A., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2024). What makes neighbourhood-level commercial centres attractive for neighbourhood residents?. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 11(1), 291-310.
14. Jadhav, S., & Ghosh, I. (2024). Future prospects of the gravity model of trade: A Bibliometric Review (1993–2021). Foreign Trade Review, 59(1), 26-61.
15. World Bank (2024): World Development Indicators: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.