How can the differentiation of the resource orchestration process help manu-facturing enterprises achieve the corresponding green transformation model? ——Based on the fsQCA qualitative analysis method
Yuxia Li
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/bam.v8i1.13641
Keywords: resource arrangement theory; green transformation; qualitative analysis; manufacturing enterprise
Abstract
Based on the fsQCA qualitative analysis method, this study explores how the differentiation of resource scheduling process can promote the green transformation of China's manufacturing enterprises to achieve different paths, and the results show that there are three paths that can enable manufacturing enterprises to achieve green transformation, namely: (1) a coordinated supply chain green integration model with external recognition as the core condition; (2) the multi-response green butterfly transformation model with value realization as the core condition; (3) The green integration model of the industrial chain with the incentive level and R&D intensity as the core conditions. In summary, this study not only enriches the research on the green transformation of enterprises by adopting different resource allocation methods in production activities and makes enterprises realize green transformation, but also provides some useful enlightenment for the upgrading of the green transformation of China's manufacturing enterprises under the current goal of "further deepening reform and promoting Chinese-style modernization".
References
[1] Liu, X. (2014). Research on Chadwick's Internet political thought [Master's thesis]. Liaoning University.
[2] Jia, Y., Su, J. (2024). How does the strategic logic of hidden champion enterprises evolve in dynamic contexts? A longitudinal case study based on attention allocation perspective. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 45(9), 104-121.
[3] Su, J., Jia, Y. (2018). Current status, application prospects and contextual depth of business administration case studies in China. Chinese Journal of Management, 15(6), 791-802.
[4] Zuo, Q. (2023). Su Taoyong: The "Student+" model of Tongji SEM. Manager, (8), 42-45.
[5] Zhu, J., Qu, X., Han, H., et al. (2024). Digital transformation and financial control innovation: An exploratory case study based on State Grid. Management World, 40(2), 172-192.
[6] Liu, H., Liu, Y., Huang, T. (2023). The process mechanism of digital technology driving high-end disruptive innovation: An exploratory case study. Management World, 39(7), 63-81,99,82.
[7] Du, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, K., et al. (2022). Business environment ecology, total factor productivity and multiple patterns of high-quality urban development: A configurational analysis based on complex systems perspective. Management World, 38(9), 127-145.
[8] Cheng, J., Liu, Q., Du, Y. (2023). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and national entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A mixed study based on NCA and fsQCA methods. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 44(3), 80-97.
[9] Lan, S. (2025). Research on the influence mechanism of corporate innovation ecosystem environment shaping strategy on key core technology breakthroughs [PhD dissertation]. Xi'an University of Technology.
[10] Tu, J. (2022). Research on the motivation and outcomes of corporate green innovation [PhD dissertation]. Wuhan University.
[11] Zhi, Y., Qin, T. (2025). The impact of green credit on corporate green transformation: From the perspective of long-term and short-term effects. Jiangsu Commercial Forum, (12), 83-87,109.
[12] Yin, J., Gao, X. (2025). The relationship between corporate digital transformation and green innovation: A meta-analysis based on the TOE framework. Journal of Technology Economics, 44(11), 49-65.