Analysis on the Research Progress of Carbon Disclosure: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review
Xiaojing Yang
Xia Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/pest.v5i2.1731
Keywords: Carbon Disclosure, Carbon Emission, Bibliometric Mapping Analysis
Abstract
In response to climate change risks, some firms have developed carbon disclosure to communicate their climate-related risk management. The literature on various facets of carbon disclosure regarding companies remains limited despite the increased interest in corporate environmental disclosure, particularly the lack of literature review work. Therefore, this article aims to systematically review the available literature by revealing current research evolution and hotspots in carbon disclosure field. By using the visualization software CiteSpace and VOSviewer, this study analyzed 606 research articles of carbon disclosure research that were published between 2000 and 2023 in the Web of Science (WOS) database, and conducted the assessment on journals, reference articles, reference journals, authorship and keywords. The results found the main research themes in carbon disclosure, including ‘strategic climate response’, ‘determinants of carbon disclosure’, ‘consequences of carbon disclosure’ and ‘climate change policy’. In addition, the hotspots on carbon disclosure have shifted to the enterprise internal environment, especially enterprise management architecture. It will help readers gain insight into carbon disclosure research, understand the evolving mechanisms in the field, and conduct future research more effectively.
References
Dilling PF, & Harris P. (2018). Reporting on long-term value creation by Canadian companies: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 350-360.
De Silva Lokuwaduge, CS, & De Silva, K. (2020). Emerging corporate disclosure of environmental social and governance (ESG) risks: An Australian study. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(2), 35-50.
Hrasky S. (2011). Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(1), 174-198.
Stechemesser K., & Guenther E. (2012). Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 17-38.
Hahn R, Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann F. (2015). Organizations, Climate Change, and Transparency: Reviewing the Literature on Carbon Disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80–102.
Borghei Z. (2021), Carbon disclosure: a systematic literature review. Account Finance, 61: 5255-5280.
Pritchard A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
Chen C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
Fu J., & Ding JD. (2019). Comparison of visualization principles between CiteSpace and vosviewer. Agric Lib Inf, 31(7), 10-13998.
Liao L, Luo L, & Tang Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British accounting review, 47(4), 409-424.
Matsumura EM., Prakash R., & Vera-Munoz SC. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The accounting review, 89(2), 695-724.
Reid EM., & Toffel MW. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic management journal, 30(11), 1157-1178.
Kolk A., & Pinkse J. (2004). Market strategies for climate change. European management journal, 22(3), 304-314.
Stanny E. (2013). Voluntary disclosures of emissions by US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 145-158.
Luo L., Tang Q., & Lan YC. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal, 26(1), 6-34.
Guenther E., Guenther T., Schiemann F., & Weber G. (2016). Stakeholder relevance for reporting: explanatory factors of carbon disclosure. Business & Society, 55(3), 361-397.
Kim EH., & Lyon TP. (2011). Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE's voluntary greenhouse gas registry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(3), 311-326.
Tang Q., & Luo L. (2014). Carbon management systems and carbon mitigation. Australian Accounting Review, 24(1), 84-98.
Liao L., Luo L., & Tang Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British accounting review, 47(4), 409-424.
Ziegler A., Busch T., & Hoffmann VH. (2011). Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Economics, 33(6), 1283-1294.
Lee SY., Park YS., & Klassen RD. (2015). Market responses to firms' voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 1-12.
Zamora-Ramírez C., González-González JM., & Sabater Marcos AM. (2016). Carbon reporting: Analysis of the Spanish market response. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 45(2), 231-265.
Kurnia P., Darlis E., & Putra AA. (2020). Carbon emission disclosure, good corporate governance, financial performance, and firm value. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 7(12), 223-231.
Fagotto E., & Graham M. (2007). Full disclosure: using transparency to fight climate change. Issues in Science and Technology, 23(4), 73-79.
Karplus VJ., & Zhang X. (2017). Incentivizing firm compliance with China’s national emissions trading system. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 6(2), 73-86.