Opportunities and challenges: A study of women's petitions in mid-17th-century England
Xiaoyan Fu
Yili Normal University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/pmcs.v8i2.14540
Keywords: English Civil War; women; petitioning; rights
Abstract
The 17th century in England witnessed profound social transformation, during which the public identity of women gradually emerged. The outbreak of the English Civil War created new opportunities for female participation in public affairs. As the conflict undermined—And in many cases effectively erased— The traditional patriarchal image of the English father as the domestic patriarch, women in England partially filled the resulting vacuum of patriarchal authority. In doing so, they departed from prevailing social norms that confined women to the private sphere, stepping beyond the household to assert their right to engage in public political affairs. Through collective actions such as petitioning, they not only demanded political participation but also sought to reshape their own image and roles at both the personal and national levels. Nevertheless, the long-established tradition of British patriarchy, which systematically devalued women's status, meant that the women's petition movement achieved only limited success. Even so, the active involvement of English women in petitioning during the mid-17th century undeniably constituted a novel attempt at open engagement with national political affairs.
References
[1] Patricia Crawford. The Challenges to Patriarchalism, p.125. Lois Schwoerer, Women's Public Political Voice, p.60.
[2] Richard Wilkinson. "How Humane was the English Civil War", History Review, 2001, p. 5.
[3] Keith Lindley. Popular Politics and Religion in Civil War London, Brookfield, Scholarly Press, 1997, p. 410.
[4] Catharine E Gray. Women Writers and Public Debate in 17th-century Britain, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, p.23.
[5] Catharine E Gray. Women Writers and Public Debate in 17th-century Britain, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, p. 24.
[6] Suzuki Mihoko. The History of British Women's Writing, 1610–1690, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, p. 66.
[7] Amanda Jane Whiting. Women and Petitioning in the Seventeenth-century English Revolution: Deference, Difference and Dissent, 2015, p. 2.
[8] Karin Bowie and Thomas Munck. 'Early Modern Political Petitioning and Public Engagement in Scotland, Britain and Scandinavia, 1550–1795', Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 38:3, pp. 271–278.
[9] Guizot History of the English Revolution of 1640 [M]. Translated by Wu Guangjian. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, 2011, p. 165.
[10] Anon A True Copie of the Petition of the Gentlewomen, and Tradesmen's Wives, in and about the City of London. Delivered to the Honourable Knights, Citizens, and Burgesses of the House of Commons in Parliament, 4 February, London, 1641, p. 6.
[11] Amanda Whiting 'Some women can shift It well enough: A Legal context for understanding the women petitioners of the seventeenth-century English revolution', Australian Feminist Law Journal, 2004, p. 2.
[12] Anon The Humble Petition of Diverse Well-Affected Women, of the Cities of London and Westminster, the Borough of Southwark, Hamlets, and Places Adjacent, London, 1648.
[13] Anne Laurence. Women in England 1500–1760: A Social History, p. 243.
[14] Amanda Whiting. 'Some Women Can Shift It Well Enough: A Legal Context for Understanding the Women Petitioners of the Seventeenth-Century English Revolution', Australian Feminist Law Journal, 2004, p. 23.
[15] Lawrence Stone. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England: 1500–1800 [M]. Translated by Diao Xiaohua. Commercial Press. 2011. p. 233.
[16] Anon. The Humble Petition of Diverse Well-Affected Women, of the Cities of London and Westminster, the Borough of Southwark, Hamlets, and Places Adjacent, London, 1648.
[17] Jacqueline Eales. Women in Early Modern England, 1500–1700, UCL Press, 1998. p. 54.
[18] Ann Hughes. Gender and the English Revolution, p. 55.
[19] Jacqueline Eales. Women in Early Modern England, 1500–1700, UCL Press, 1998. p. 57.
[20] Joan K. Kinnaird. "Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism", Journal of British Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1979, p. 53.