Probe - Media and Communication Studies

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
Register Login

ISSN

2661-4111(Online)

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$800

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Download Full Text PDF

Published

2025-01-02

Issue

Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Published

Section

Articles

Rhetoric in political debate: the case study of the 2014 LBC leaders’ debate clash

Yirong He

Dianchi College of Yunnan University


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/pmcs.v6i4.8419


Keywords: Discourse; Political communication; Rhetoric; Persuasion


Abstract

This paper investigates the intricate role that language and rhetoric play in political discourse. It intends to investigate the merits and advantages of political discourse,with a focus on the significance of language skills and rhythm in the process.(Tileagă, 2014a)The ultimate goal of political debate is to gain public support;therefore,it is essential to comprehend how language can be modified to capture the audience’s attention and persuade them to adopt the speaker’s line of reasoning.


References

[1] Balch, A., & Balabanova, E. (2016). Ethics, Politics and Migration: Public Debates on the Free Movement of Romanians and Bulgarians in the UK, 2006–2013. Politics, 36(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12082

[2] Clementson, D. E., Zhao, W., & Park, S. (2023). How Intense Language Hurts a Politician’s Trustworthiness: Voter Norms of a Political Debate via Language Expectancy Theory.

[3] Journal ofLanguage and Social Psychology, 0261927X2311716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X231171688

[4] Demasi, M. A. (2019). Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union. Political Psychology, 40(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10. 1111/pops.12496

[5] Drake, P., & Higgins, M. (2012). Lights, Camera, Election: Celebrity, Performance and the 2010 UK General Election Leadership Debates. The British Journal ofPolitics and International Relations, 14(3), 375–391. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j. 1467-856X.2011.00504.x

[6] Harmer, E., Savigny, H., & Ward, O. (2017). ‘Are you tough enough? ’ Performing gender in the UK leadership debates 2015. Media, Culture & Society, 39(7), 960–975.

[7] https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716682074

[8] Tileagă, C. (2014a). Political rhetoric. In Political Psychology (pp. 144–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10. 1017/cbo9781139084550.010

[9] Berger, P. L. (2011). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Open Road Media.

[10] Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications. SAGE Publications, Limited.



ISSN: 2661-4111
21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com