How does the systematic points system promote the development of green and quality agriculture: Based on a case study of Youxiqiao Village, Hunan Province
Lingling Mei
School of Finance and Public Administration, Anhui University of Finance and Economics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/bam.v8i2.14505
Keywords: points system; green and quality agriculture; rural governance; rural revitalization
Abstract
This paper takes Youxiqiao Village in Xinhua County, Hunan Province as a case to explore the mechanism and practical path of the systematic points system in boosting green and quality agriculture. It finds that from the perspective of "institution-technology-morality" synergy, the points system deeply integrates with the demands of green and quality agriculture, forming a complete innovative model for coordinated rural governance and agricultural development. The model defines behavioral boundaries and reward-punishment standards through institutionalized rules, supports full-process supervision and transparent operation via technological tools, and fosters endogenous motivation through moralized recognition. Linked by the points system, the three dimensions effectively solve problems such as difficult supervision, insufficient incentives and lack of recognition in the promotion of green and quality agriculture, providing a replicable path for the high-quality development of green and quality agriculture under China's rural revitalization strategy.
References
[1] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Guiding Opinions on Accelerating the Comprehensive Green Transformation of Agricultural Development to Promote Rural Ecological Revitalization [EB/OL]. (2024-12-27) [2025-11-09]. https://zzys.moa.gov.cn/tzgg/202501/t20250111_6469059.htm.
[2] Xinhua News Agency. Proposal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development [EB/OL]. (2025-10-28) [2025-12-13]. https://www.news.cn/politics/20251028/08920d9f557c432e99459f8f468504db/c.html.
[3] Zhang Yu, Zhu Lizhi. Thoughts on Green Development in the "Rural Revitalization" Strategy [J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 40(01): 65-71.
[4] Jin Shaorong, Ren Zanjie. The impact of rural digitalization on agricultural green total factor productivity [J]. Reform, 2022(12): 102-118.
[5] Zeng Fanyin. Institutional Guarantee and Path Selection for Green Agricultural Development [J]. Jianghuai Forum, 2024(01): 13-20.
[6] Wang Yinhong, Ding Murong. Rebuilding Identity: How Points System Promotes Rural Governance [J]. China Rural Observation, 2025(01): 145-163.
[7] Ding Bo. Digital Mobilization: The Governance Foundation and Practical Logic of the Rural Digital Points System [J]. Jianghuai Forum, 2025(04): 108-115.
[8] Scott W. R. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interets, and identities[M]. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
[9] Berger P. L. Luckman T. Realistic Social Construction: An Outline of the Sociology of Knowledge [M]. Translated by Wu Suran, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2019.
[10] Cheng Tongshun, Liu Jia. Cultural re-embedding: Optimization of Traditional Points System in Rural Governance: A Case Study Based on Village Z in Tianjin [J]. Jianghai Academic Journal. 2025(01): 147-156.